Brumsey v. . Mathias

The issues submitted to the jury and their answers thereto were as follows:

"1. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendants, as alleged in the complaint? Ans.: ``Yes.'

"2. Was the negligence of the defendants gross negligence? Ans.: ``No.'

"3. Did the plaintiff contribute to his injury by his own negligence, as alleged in the answer? Ans.: ``No.'

"4. What damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendants? Ans.: ``$500.00.'"

The court below rendered judgment on the verdict against the defendants for $500.00. The defendants made numerous exceptions and appealed to the Supreme Court. The injury to plaintiff occurred in the State of Virginia. The evidence indicates that plaintiff was a guest. Under the law of Virginia a guest cannot recover except for gross negligence.

From a careful reading and re-reading of the record and briefs, we cannot say that the conduct of defendants amounted to gross negligence.Farfour v. Fahad, 214 N.C. 281.

The judgment is

Reversed.