Brewer v. Tysor

Pearson, J.

This case as it is now presented, differs wholly from that of Brewer v. Tysor, 3 Jones’ Rep. 180. There the contract was entire ; here it is divided into three separate and distinct parts. There can be no reason why the plaintiffs should not recover for the work done on the two parts which were finished according to the contract. There is no error.

Per Curiam, Judgment affirmed.