DocketNumber: 595
Citation Numbers: 81 S.E.2d 664, 240 N.C. 259, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 414
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed Date: 5/5/1954
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Stevens, Burgwin & McGhee, Wilmington, for plaintiff appellee.
M. C. McLeod, Rockingham, for defendant appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appellant assigns as error the findings of fact by the court below. However, the assignment is not supported by an exception to such findings, therefore, it is feckless. Worsley v. S. & W. Rendering Co., 239 N.C. 547, 80 S.E.2d 467; Wyatt v. Sharp, 239 N.C. 655, 80 S.E.2d 762. Moreover, when no exception is taken to findings of fact, they are presumed to be supported by the evidence and are binding on appeal. Wyatt v. Sharp, supra, and cases cited therein.
The ruling of the court below is
Affirmed.
Wyatt v. Sharp , 239 N.C. 655 ( 1954 )
City of Raleigh v. Morand , 247 N.C. 363 ( 1957 )
Stancil v. Stancil , 255 N.C. 507 ( 1961 )
Moore v. Crosswell , 240 N.C. 473 ( 1954 )
Tillis v. Calvine Cotton Mills, Inc. , 244 N.C. 587 ( 1956 )
City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. , 246 N.C. 101 ( 1957 )
Bulman v. Southern Baptist Convention , 248 N.C. 392 ( 1958 )
Suits v. Old Equity Life Insurance Company , 241 N.C. 483 ( 1955 )
Beaver v. Crawford Paint Co. , 240 N.C. 328 ( 1954 )