DocketNumber: 612
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed Date: 11/23/1966
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Ottway Burton, Asheboro, for plaintiff appellant.
Coltrane & Gavin, Asheboro, for defendant appellee.
PER CURIAM.
"[W]hen a trial court sets aside a verdict in its discretion, as here, its action in so doing is not subject to review by appeal to the Supreme Court, in the absence of a manifest abuse of discretion. Walston v. Greene, 246 N.C. 617, 99 S.E.2d 805; Veazey v. City of Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 57 S.E.2d 377; Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N.C. 808, 161 S.E. 686; Bird v. Bradburn, 131 N.C. 488, 42 S.E. 936; Brink v. *19 Black, 74 N.C. 329." Goldston v. Wright, 257 N.C. 279, 125 S.E.2d 462.
Here, as in Goldston, the record discloses no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court. The appeal is without substance and will be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.