Judges: Winborne
Filed Date: 3/3/1943
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
Two civil actions, numbered in Superior Court 52 and 54, instituted 26 January, 1940, under provisions of C. S., 7990, for foreclosure of liens upon real estate for taxes due thereon, in each of which, after judgments entered and sales had and deeds executed pursuant thereto, and appeal inWashington County v. Gaines,
Upon such hearing, judgment was entered in each action at October Term, 1942, in which it is adjudged among other things: (1) That the *Page 638 order of sale of the land for taxes, the sale thereof by the commissioner, the order of confirmation and the deed to the county of Washington made thereunder, be and same are set aside and declared to be void and of no effect; (2) that the respondents, C. T. Gaines, J. C. Kirkman and S.D. Davis, who have entered into certain contracts with the county of Washington to purchase the timber and all of the land purchased by it under said order of sale, "are privies to the aforesaid sale," and have been duly served with notice of the motion being heard, and participated in the hearing thereof, and that the deeds, contracts or conveyances of any portion of said land to them are void and of no effect, and that the county of Washington is directed to return and pay over to the said C. T. Gaines, J. C. Kirkman and S.D. Davis all moneys that have been paid to and are now held by the county on any such purchase; and (3) that the county of Washington be allowed to make such other and additional parties to this action as may be necessary and required by law for the foreclosure of a tax lien under section 7990 of the Consolidated Statutes of North Carolina, and to proceed according to law for the foreclosure of such tax lien as it may have on the property herein described.
From such judgments, plaintiff, county of Washington, and respondents, C. T. Gaines, J. C. Kirkman and S.D. Davis, appeal to the Supreme Court, and assign error.
While it may well be doubted that any valid exceptive assignment of error has been made to appear, it is noted at the threshold of this appeal that the pleadings are not contained in the record. Only excerpts from the complaint are shown in the findings of fact, to which the parties agree. Hence, in accordance with the uniform practice in such cases, the appeal must be dismissed. See S. v. Lumber Co.,
Appeal dismissed.