Sherrod v. ANY CHILD OR CHILDREN HEREAFTER BORN TO WATSON N. SHERROD

Judge Phillips

dissenting.

In my opinion the devise involved was for the benefit of all the children of the testator’s son, regardless of when born; the devise does not authorize Watson N. Sherrod, Jr. to sell his children’s farm, though it does authorize him to manage and operate it until the oldest child’s thirtieth birthday.

I vote to affirm the declaratory judgment.