State v. Royall

An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute
controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance
with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.
NO. COA14-363
NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS
Filed: 19 August 2014
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
v. Yadkin County
Nos. 13CRS000348, 050470
JASON DALE ROYALL,
Defendant.
Appeal by defendant from judgment entered on or about 29
October 2013 by Judge Timothy S. Kincaid in Yadkin County
Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 11 August 2014.
Attorney General Roy A. Cooper III, by Assistant Attorney
General James C. Holloway, for the State.
Don Willey for defendant-appellant.
STROUD, Judge.
Defendant Jason Dale Royall appeals from judgment dated 29
October 2013 and entered upon his guilty plea to felony larceny
and attaining the status of an habitual felon. The trial court
sentenced defendant to a term of 100 to 132 months imprisonment.
Counsel appointed to represent defendant has been unable to
identify any issue with sufficient merit to support a meaningful
argument for relief on appeal and asks that this Court conduct
-2-
its own review of the record for possible prejudicial error.
Counsel has shown to the satisfaction of this Court that he has
complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738, 18 L.Ed. 2d 493 (1967), and State v. Kinch, 314 N.C. 99,
331 S.E.2d 665 (1985), by advising defendant of his right to
file written arguments with this Court and providing him with
the documents necessary for him to do so.
Defendant has not filed any written arguments on his own
behalf with this Court and a reasonable time in which he could
have done so has passed. In accordance with Anders, we have
fully examined the record to determine whether any issues of
arguable merit appear therefrom. We have been unable to find
any possible prejudicial error and conclude that the appeal is
wholly frivolous.
NO ERROR.
Judges BRYANT and HUNTER, JR., Robert N. concur.
Report per Rule 30(e).