DocketNumber: I.C. NOS. TA-19858 TA-19980.
Judges: <center> DECISION AND ORDER for the Full Commission by BERNADINE S. BALLANCE, Commissioner, N.C. Industrial Commission.</center>
Filed Date: 9/26/2008
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
1. These matters, consolidated on April 18, 2007, are before the North Carolina Industrial Commission on the defendant's Motion to Dismiss.
2. The plaintiff alleged in his Affidavit that he suffered cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of his constitutional rights, and of the "Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act," as a result of being placed in an overcrowded inmate dormitory. The plaintiff further contends that he did not receive an amiable resolution to the situation through the Inmate Grievance Procedure, in violation of
3. The defendant moved to dismiss the plaintiff's claims on the following grounds: (1) lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, since the allegations of the Affidavit allege intentional acts and constitutional violations by state employees, and these are matters over which the North Carolina Industrial Commission has no jurisdiction; (2) failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, in that the plaintiff's allegations are not sufficient to establish that the injuries sustained were the proximate result of a negligent act of a named state employee acting within the course and scope of his employment, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure; (3) the plaintiff's allegations do not establish negligence; (4) the plaintiff did not show that any injuries incurred were the proximate result of negligent acts; and (5) the plaintiff's Affidavit failed to comply with Rule 9(j) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure.
4. The plaintiff moved for a default judgment against the defendant, allegedly due to the defendant's failure to timely answer his claim.
5. The plaintiff received ample opportunity to respond to the defendant's Motion at the hearing before Special Deputy Commissioner Taylor on December 6, 2007. *Page 3
6. The plaintiff failed to describe any negligence on the part of the named state employees, and, the North Carolina Industrial Commission has no jurisdiction over the plaintiff's claims for constitutional violations and/or intentional misconduct of named state employees.
7. The plaintiff is not entitled to a default judgment against the defendant, as no Answer is required until a ruling is made on defendant's Motions to Dismiss.
1. N.C. Gen. Stat. §
2. The plaintiff's allegations in his Affidavit and at the motions hearing, taken as true, amount to allegations of intentional acts and constitutional violations on the part of the defendant. The plaintiff did not state an actionable claim for negligence against the defendant.
3. Claims based on intentional acts and/or constitutional violations are not within the scope of the North Carolina Tort Claims Act. N.C. Gen. Stat. §
4. The plaintiff is not entitled to a default judgment against the defendant.
2. No costs are taxed as plaintiff was permitted to file this civil action in forma pauperis.
This the 14th day of August, 2008.
S/___________________
BERNADINE S. BALLANCE
COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
S/___________________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER
S/___________________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER