DocketNumber: File No. 6859-A.
Citation Numbers: 6 N.W.2d 95, 72 N.D. 244
Judges: Burke, Burr, Christianson, Morris, Nuessle
Filed Date: 11/2/1942
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
This action involves title to a quarter section of land in Steele County. It is a companion case of that of Lyche v. Steele County, ante, 238,
Where no bids are received for any parcel of property advertised to be sold under the provisions of chapter 235, ND Session Laws 1939, it may be sold at any subsequent time by the county auditor provided that no such sale shall be made at a price less than the minimum fixed by the board of county commissioners prior to the November sale. However, Mr. Meldahl declined to purchase or redeem the quarter section herein involved unless he could also secure the land that had been sold to Mrs. Balyeat. On November 22, 1940, three days after the advertised sale, Mr. Meldahl demanded and received the two checks that he had tendered for taxes on all of the Berg land including the quarter involved in this case.
After the return of Mr. Meldahl's checks and on December 17, 1940, Steele county sold to the defendant T.F. Beadle on contract for deed the SE quarter of Section 14, Township 148, Range 55, Steele county *Page 246 being the land involved in this case. The purchase price was $600; $150 thereof being in cash.
The trial court found that the title to the above-described land was in Steele county subject to the contract for deed issued to the defendant T.F. Beadle and quieted title in the county subject to contract. The determination of the trial court was unquestionably correct. No redemption or repurchase was made by the executor either acting in his own behalf or through Carl A. Meldahl. Mr. Meldahl declined to redeem or repurchase the land and demanded the return of his checks. No other tender was made by either him or the executor. The title to the real estate herein involved was in Steele County on December 17, 1940, the date of the sale to T.F. Beadle. No redemption or repurchase by or on behalf of the Berg estate was made prior to that date. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
BURR, Ch. J., and BURKE, NUESSLE, and CHRISTIANSON, JJ., concur.