State v. Serdahl

FILED
IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
DECEMBER 15, 2023
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2023 ND 236State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Wesley Wayne Serdahl, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20230204
Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial
District, the Honorable Todd L. Cresap, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Tiffany M. Sorgen, Assistant State’s Attorney, Minot, N.D., for plaintiff and
appellee; submitted on brief.
Thomas J. Burckhard, Minot, N.D., for defendant and appellant; submitted on
brief.
State v. Serdahl
No. 20230204
Per Curiam.
Wesley Wayne Serdahl appeals from a criminal judgment entered after
a jury convicted him of terrorizing. He argues the conviction is not supported
by sufficient evidence. “In reviewing challenges to the sufficiency of the
evidence on appeal, the defendant bears the burden of showing the evidence
reveals no reasonable inference of guilt when viewed in the light most
favorable to the verdict.” State v. Grant, 2023 ND 62, ¶ 18, 988 N.W.2d 563(cleaned up). After reviewing the record, we conclude substantial evidence
supports the conviction. We summarily affirm the judgment under
N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte
Douglas A. Bahr
1