Winter v. Doane

Per Curiam.

The District Court’s finding of the defendant Doane to be in contempt and its dismissal of his cross-petition as a sanction for failing to answer a deposition question ordered answered by the court was correct and is affirmed. See Campbell v. Lutz, 182 Neb. 27, 152 N.W.2d 101 (1967).

Affirmed.