Filed Date: 4/6/1979
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
REQUESTED BY: Dear Senator Johnson:
You have asked us two questions with respect to Amendment No. 6 appearing on page 1264 of the Legislative Journal, Eighty-sixth Legislature, First Session, 1979. You point out that the amendment exempts from the limitation imposed by LB 285 the increased costs of electricity and other fuels purchased by elementary and secondary schools.
In your first question you ask whether or not this violates the Equal Protection Clause of the
In the second part of your query regarding the amendment, you ask whether or not it might violate the prohibition against local or special laws in Article
In any event, the classification of subdivisions for the purposes of different treatment is well recognized. A number of statutory enactments classify various subdivisions for purposes of different treatment. Cities are classified as metropolitan, primary, etc. Counties are classified according to population with certain powers granted some classes not granted others. Different types of subdivisions are granted different powers. None of these types of classifications are held to be improper or in violation of Article III, section 18, unless the court can clearly see that the Legislature has by artificial and baseless classification attempted to evade and violate the provisions of the Constitution prohibiting local or special legislation. See,Dwyer v. Omaha-Douglas Public Building Commission,