Filed Date: 10/8/1980
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
REQUESTED BY: Dear Senator Haberman:
You have asked us whether subdivisions which have a statutory authorization to levy a tax up to a specific mill amount may utilize that statutory authorization or are they limited by the provisions of Neb.Rev.Stat. §
You indicate in your request letter that you are considering legislation in the upcoming session in this area. For that reason we will answer your question.
In your question you point to natural resource districts which are authorized to levy a tax of up to one-quarter mill on all property in a ground water control area. In answer to your question we point out that Neb.Rev.Stat.
"[No] governing body of any political subdivision shall adopt a budget statement pursuant to section
23-925 , or pursuant to the charter or ordinances of a city with a home rule charter, in which the anticipated combined receipts for the ensuing fiscal year exceeds an increase of seven per cent above the combined receipts budget base."
The combined receipts budget base is defined in Neb.Rev.Stat. §
Section
We believe in construing these sections together one can only conclude that notwithstanding the fact that a political subdivision may be authorized to levy up to a specific mill amount if it is not so levying that amount it may not levy to that amount if such a levy would result in a violation of the seven percent limit on local subdivision budget increases. Thus the answer to your question is that the seven percent lid law takes precedence over a specific mill levy limitation upon political subdivisions.