Brown (Craig) v. State

 he fails to demonstrate plain error entitling him to relief. See NRS
178.602; Green v. State, 119 Nev. 542, 545, 80 P.3d 93, 95 (2003) ("[T]he
burden is on the defendant to show actual prejudice or a miscarriage of
justice."). Additionally, to the extent Brown raises the argument, we
further conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by
revoking his probation. See Lewis v. State, 90 Nev. 436, 438, 529 P.2d 796,
797 (1974); see generally McNallen v. State, 91 Nev. 592, 540 P.2d 121(1975) (revocation of probation affirmed where violation by probationer not
refuted). Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'
Gibbons
J.
Douglas Saitta
cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge
Clark County Public Defender
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
'The fast track response submitted by the State does not comply
with NRAP 3C(h)(1) and NRAP 32(a)(4) because the text is not double-
spaced. Counsel for the State is cautioned that the failure to comply with
the briefing requirements in the future may result in the imposition of
sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A
M3
fez