Terra Contracting, Inc. v. Dist. Ct. (Lopez)

 petitions if no factual dispute exists and the district court was obligated to
dismiss the action pursuant to clear authority or if an important issue of
law needs clarification. Id. at 197-98, 179 P.3d at 559.
Petitioner challenges the district court's denial of a motion to
dismiss. Given the pleading standard set forth in NRCP 8, we decline to
intervene through extraordinary writ relief at this time. See Buzz Stew,
LLC v. City of N. Las Vegas, 124 Nev. 224, 227-28, 181 P.3d 670, 672
(2008) (explaining this court's standard of review). Accordingly, we deny
the petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851.
Our denial, however, is without prejudice to petitioner's right to seek
review again after the district court resolves any motion for summary
judgment in the matter below.
It is so ORDERED.
cc: Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge
Shumway Van & Hansen
Dixon Law Firm LLC
Esther Rodriguez
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A So