Accomando v. Accomando

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARIO ACCOMANDO, No. 84097
Appellant,
vS.
GEORGANN ROSE ACCOMANDO,
Respondent.
FILED
FEB 1 1 2022
ELIZABETH A. BROWN
CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
By "5
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUTY CLERK
This is a pro se appeal from a purported district court order
entered on October 15, 2021. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court
Division, Clark County; Amy Mastin, Judge.
Review of the notice of appeal and other documents before this
court reveals a jurisdictional defect. No district court order was entered on
October 15, 2021. To the extent appellant is attempting to appeal from the
cancellation of a hearing on his motion to determine respondent's mental
health, such a cancellation is not appealable. See Brown v. WIC
Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court
„
may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule").
Accordingly, this court
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Stiglich Herndon
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) I 947A 407.4P4.-
- ozI613
cc: Hon. Amy Mastin, District Judge, Family Court Division
Mario Accomando
Reza Athari & Associates, PLLC.
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1947A cOatt,