Baugh (Taursus) v. State

 imposed by probation officer." After the State first sought revocation, the
district court continued Baugh's probation, entered an amended judgment
of conviction, and noted that "if Defendant is terminated by Drug Court,
her Probation will be revoked and prison time will be imposed."
Approximately five weeks later, Baugh was terminated from the drug
court program. At the subsequent revocation hearing, the district court
reiterated that Baugh's "prior reinstatement was conditioned on [her] not
being terminated from Drug Court," and while it acknowledged that the
State also submitted a report listing other violations, the district court
emphasized that "the reason we're here today is 'cause she was terminated
from Drug Court." As a result, the district court found that Baugh's
conduct was not as good as required and revoked her probation. See id.
Additionally, Baugh conceded at the hearing that she violated the terms of
her probation by not complying with the curfew provision. See generally
McNallen v. State, 91 Nev. 592, 540 P.2d 121 (1975) (revocation of
probation affirmed where violation by probationer not refuted). The
record does not demonstrate that the district court based its revocation
decision on any improper evidence, and we conclude that the district court
did not abuse its discretion by revoking Baugh's probation. Accordingly,
we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
J.
Hardesty
J.
Douglas
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A
cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge
Hua Ferguson Law Offices
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1947A .(tcP4c.