DocketNumber: 63846
Filed Date: 10/16/2013
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
shall file a habeas corpus petition as a new action separate and distinct from any original proceeding in which a conviction has been had); Daniels v. State,100 Nev. 579
, 580,688 P.2d 315
, 316 (1984) (recognizing that a post-conviction proceeding is separate from the direct appeal), overruled on other grounds by Varwig v. State,104 Nev. 40
,752 P.2d 760
(1988); Groesbeck v. Warden,100 Nev. 259
, 260,679 P.2d 1268
, 1268-69 (1984) (recognizing that a post-conviction habeas corpus petition is a petition seeking collateral review).' Further, the direct appeal had been resolved and the remittitur had issued, returning jurisdiction to the district court, when appellant filed her petition on August 20, 2013. See Dennis v. State, Docket No. 61800 (Order of Affirmance, April 9, 2013) (remittitur issued May 8, 2013). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order. tx124.; J. Hardesty Parraguirre 0124, Cherry J. 1-We note that the district court could take the matter off calendar pending resolution of the direct appeal. This solution would preserve the timeliness of the petition. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A • cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge Antwanette Denise Dennis Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A