Tobin v. The Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
NONA TOBIN, No. 85251
Petitioner,
vs. F E E„
. be
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,
SEP i 9 2.022
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF
reAe:.
CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE
JESSICA K. PETERSON, DISTRICT DEP !CLERK
JUDGE,
Res22_ndents.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is an original pro se petition for a writ of prohibition and/or
mandamus challenging district court orders in a civil action. Having
considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and
discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Pan
v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844
(2004) (explaining that writ relief is proper only when there is no plain,
speedy, and adequate remedy at law and that petitioners bear the burden
to demonstrate that extraordinary relief is warranted). Even when an
appeal is not immediately available because the challenged order is
interlocutory in nature, the fact that the order may ultimately be challenged
on appeal from a final judgment generally precludes writ relief. Pan, 120
Nev. at 225, 88 P.3d at 841. Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.1
1We note that petitioner complains of various rulings and actions
taken by the district court in this case, including that it allowed a nonparty
SUPREME COURT
to participate in the proceedings, but she failed to name any of the other
OF
NEVADA
fib I U-17:1
Parraguirre
Hardesty
Stiglich
cc: Hon. Jessica K. Peterson, District Judge
Nona Tobin
Attorney General/Carson City
Eighth District Court Clerk
parties to the district court case, or the purported nonparty, as real parties
in interest to this writ proceeding, and her September 13, 2022, proof of
SUPREME COURT service does not indicate that they were served. See NRAP 21(a)(1) & (2).
OF
NEVADA
I ,)17, \
2