DocketNumber: No. 3076
Citation Numbers: 38 P.2d 972, 55 Nev. 444
Judges: <italic>Per Curiam:</italic>
Filed Date: 12/31/1934
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
"Findings of Fact. That on or about the 10th day of April, 1915, one John Woods, on behalf of Ada G. Corey, of Washoe County, Nevada, and others, did consult accused, A. Grant Miller, in his professional capacity for the purpose of employing him in the matter of the administration of the estate of Curtis E. Woods, late husband of said Ada G. Corey, and did then and there employ said A. Grant Miller in his professional capacity to handle the administration of said estate, which employment was accepted by said A. Grant Miller; that said A. Grant Miller has refused, failed and neglected to prosecute the administration of said estate to a conclusion, although often requested so to do, and has never proceeded to the closing up of said estate, even after the filing of the complaint herein; that the neglect and failure of said A. Grant Miller to complete the administration of said estate in accordance with his employment, was without any or sufficient cause or excuse."
"Conclusions of Law. That said accused, A. Grant Miller, has, in the administration of the Estate of Curtis E. Woods, been guilty of unprofessional conduct warranting his being disciplined therefor in the manner hereinafter, in the order, set forth."
1, 2. The first question to arise is whether or not the negligence of an attorney of record for an estate or executor or administrator is sufficient to require his disbarment or suspension from the practice of law for any period of time. The law implies a promise on the part of an attorney that he will execute the business intrusted to him with a reasonable degree of care, skill and dispatch, and the attorney is liable for a violation *Page 446 of his obligation, provided damages result therefrom. 3 Cal. Jurisp. 670; 2 R.C.L. 1012. There is nothing in the record in this case to show that the complainant suffered any actual damages because of the petitioner's neglect to close the estate with reasonable dispatch. We assume that the petitioner, when he accepted the employment, knew of the statute which requires that the act concerning estates of deceased persons shall be liberally construed to the end that justice may be done all parties and a speedy settlement of estates at the least expense secured; and all attorneys for estates or executors or administrators shall be attorneys of record with like powers and responsibilities as attorneys in other actions and proceedings. Undoubtedly the acceptance of the employment as attorney for the estate made it the duty of the petitioner, in his professional management, to effect a speedy settlement of the estate at the least cost or expense. In this case the petitioner's employment was in April, 1915, and he continued as attorney for the estate down to the present time, or for a period of nearly twenty years, without bringing about the settlement of the estate.
3, 4. It is held that mere negligence in the performance of duty is not sufficient to require the disbarment of an attorney. 2 R.C.L. 1095, citing in support of the text In re O'Keefe,
It is therefore ordered that A. Grant Miller be suspended as a member of the state bar of Nevada and from the practice of law in this state for a period of six months.