Raske v. the Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct.

An unpublis d order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADfi
a); 194M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
VVILLIANI JEFFREY RASKE, No. 67093
Petitionen
ve.
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT F E L E D
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, ,
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF JUL 2 3 2915
CLERK, IE MAN
Reepondent. __ *7 fig U
uwcuaau
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR
WRI T OF M’DAM US 0R PH OHIBI T1 ON ‘
This pro se writ petition challengee a district court default
judgment and a post-judgment ruling on a claim of exemption. In light of
the underlying matter’s progression since this writ petition was filed, We
conclude that our extraordinary intervention is unwarranted. NRS
34.160; NBS 34.320; Pan U. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 1:20 Nev. 222,
228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2.004) (recognizing that the petitioner bears the
burden of demenstrating that this court’s intervention is warranted).
Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
Saitta
Gibbons
Pickering
cc: William Jeffrey Raske
Attorney GeneralfCarsun City
Eighth District Court Clerk
, $1933?