Villa Vecchio Ct Trust v. Deutsche Bank

 REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND
REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings
consistent with this order.
,J.
Hardesty
Douglas
CHERRY, J., concurring:
For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v.
U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
that respondent Deutsche Bank lost its lien priority by virtue of the
homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize,
however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly,
concur in the disposition of this appeal.
J.
cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge
Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Ltd.
Akerman LLP/Las Vegas
Kravitz, Schnitzer & Johnson, Chtd.
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A