DocketNumber： 68847
Filed Date： 9/28/2015
Status： Non-Precedential
Modified Date： 9/29/2015
custody and support case out of which the underlying child support enforcement action arises and in which the district court has apparently determined that petitioner is willfully underemployed. Second, to the extent petitioner challenges his current confinement in the Clark County Detention Center, his petition indicates that he is set to be released on September 26, 2015. The warrant was served on August 27, 2015, but petitioner did not file this petition until September 22. The delay in challenging that confinement leaves this court with insufficient time to order an answer and deliberate on and resolve the petition before his release. Third, to the extent petitioner challenges the most recent contempt finding and imposition of another 25-day term of conditional confinement from the hearing before the master on September 1, 2015, this writ petition appears premature. According to the appendix, petitioner has filed an objection in the lower court to the master's recommendation in which he raises issues about his inability to pay the arrears, and a hearing on that matter before the district court is set for October 13, 2015. See NRS 425.3844. Under these circumstances, we decline to intervene at this time and we deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court,107 Nev. 674
, 677,818 P.2d 849
, 851 (1991) (stating that a petition for extraordinary writ relief is purely discretionary with this court). It is so ORDERED. Parraguirre SUPREME COURT OF Douglas Cherry NEVADA 2 (0) t94Th cc: Hon. Rena G. Hughes, District Judge, Family Court Division Jimmerson Hansen Attorney General/Carson City Juliann Fox Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 071 1947A -