Moran (Marvin) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

 mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, and it is within the discretion of
this court to determine if a petition will be considered. See Poulos v.
Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 98 Nev. 453, 455, 652 P.2d 1177, 1178 (1982);
see also State ex rel. Dep't Transp. v. Thompson, 99 Nev. 358, 360, 662
P.2d 1338, 1339 (1983). Because petitioner has an adequate remedy at
law to challenge the district court's ruling by way of an appeal should he
be convicted, see Williams v. Eight Judicial Dist. Court, 127 Nev. ,
262 P.3d 360, 365 (2011) (emphasizing that "generally this court will not
consider writ petitions challenging evidentiary rulings, as those rulings
are discretionary and there typically is an adequate remedy in the form of
an appeal following an adverse final judgment"), we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
Parraguirre
, J.
Douglas
cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge
Clark County Public Defender
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A en