DocketNumber: 67074
Filed Date: 1/15/2015
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 1/16/2015
107 Nev. at677, 818 P.2d at 851
, and it is petitioner's burden to demonstrate that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Din. Court,120 Nev. 222
, 228,88 P.3d 840
, 844 (2004). Moreover, writ relief is generally available only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Int'l GameTech., 124 Nev. at 197
, 179 P.3d at 558. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our intervention is warranted at this time. NRAP 21(b)(1);Pan, 120 Nev. at 228
, 88 P.3d at 844; Smith, 107 Nev. at677, 818 P.2d at 851
. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED. Parraguirre Lccp., , J. Douglas cc: Hon. Janet J. Berry, District Judge Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, L.L.P. Georgeson Angaran, Chtd. Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg Maddox, Segerblom & Canepa, LLP Gordon & Rees, LLP Leverty & Associates Law, Chtd. Washoe District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A mem