Dlouhy v. Dist. Ct. (Rodriguez-Garay)

 Petitioner has failed to include the challenged order of the
district court. NRAP 21(a)(4). Without that basis, the writ petition does
not show that the law clearly compels a writ in petitioner's favor, and
petitioner has not shown that relief is warranted. Int'l Game Tech., 124
Nev. at 197, 179 P.3d at 558; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. Thus,
we conclude that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not
warranted. NRAP 21(b); Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851.
Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
,Laads.„
Hardesty
, J.
Douglas
Ch$24
Cherry
cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge
Law Offices of Kenneth E. Goates
Law Office of William R. Brenske
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(01 1947A e