Johnson (Michael) v. State

 recommended by the Division of Parole and Probation, we conclude that
his claim is without merit because a district court does not abuse its
discretion by imposing a sentence in excess of that suggested by the
Division. See Collins v. State, 88 Nev. 168, 171, 494 P.2d 956, 957 (1972).
Having concluded that Johnson is not entitled to relief, we
ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
et Asktik_ 9, J.
Parraguirre Saitta
cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge
Nguyen & Lay
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1947A e