Accomando v. Accomando (Child Custody)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARIO ACCOMANDO, No. 85275
vs.
Appellant, MEL,'
GEORGANN ROSE ACCOMANDO, SEP 1. .0"22
• Res ondent. • ". 137 '..",s/N
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Y.
DEP-MY
This is a pro se appeal from a divorce decree . Eighth Judicial
District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Amy Mastin, Judge.
Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to
NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal
was untimely filed under NRAP 4(a) because it was filed more than 30 days
after service of written notice of entry of the judgment or order. See NRAP
4(a)(1); NRAP 26(c). The divorce decree was filed on June 29, 2022, and
written notice of entry was served on appellant on July 6, 2022. Appellant
did not file the notice of appeal until August 29, 2022, well after expiration
of the 30-day appeal period. NRAP 4(a)(1). An untimely notice of appeal
fails to vest jurisdiction in this court. Healy v. Volkstvagenwerk
Aktiengesellschaft, 103 Nev. 329, 741 P.2d 432 (1987). This court lacks
jurisdiction and
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.'
, J.
Hardesty
Stiglich Herndon
'Appellant's motion for a stay is denied as moot.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
pki7A
cc: Hon. Amy Mastin, District Judge, Family Court Division
Mario Accomando
Reza Athari & Associates, PLLC.
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
01, MITA
2