Health Plan of Nev., Inc. v. Dist. Ct. (Paul)

this court's discretion. Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674,
677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). It is petitioners' burden to demonstrate
that this court's extraordinary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth
Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).
Having considered the petition and appendix, we conclude
that writ relief is not merited. See Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at
851. Accordingly, we deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1).
It is so ORDERED.
, C.J.
Pieike4 tli p
Pickering
MOM
J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge
Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP
Holland & Hart LLP/Las Vegas
Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC
Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP/Las Vegas
Eglet Law Group
Kemp, Jones & Coulthard, LLP
Eighth District Court Clerk
2