would not be detrimental to the integrity and standing of the bar, to the administration of justice, or to the public interest. The panel unanimously recommended that Montelongo be reinstated, subject to the following conditions: (1) Montelongo must enter into a two-year mentoring agreement focused on law office management and accounting practices. Nevada Attorney Nadia von Magdenko has agreed to act as Montelongo's mentor, and the State Bar has approved of her selection. During this time, von Magdenko shall submit quarterly reports to the State Bar, indicating in a final report whether Montelongo would benefit from continued mentorship. (2) During the two-year period following reinstatement, Montelongo shall practice only criminal law. (3) Montelongo must complete 21 hours of continuing legal education (CUE) per year for the two-year period following reinstatement. This CLE shall include courses on office management, trust accounts, and law office practice. The CLE shall consist of 15 hours of general credits and 6 hours of ethics credits each year. (4) Montelongo shall timely resolve an outstanding State Bar Client Security Fund (CSF) matter. Ruiz v. Montelongo. SUPREME CouRt OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A e9, (5) Montelongo shall pay the costs of the reinstatement proceedings in accordance with SCR 120. 2 We also agree with the panel's recommendation that Montelongo repay the CSF $127,470 from his settlement of a civil suit against Wells Fargo BankS that stems from the conduct that led to his disbarment. Montelongo has provided documentation demonstrating that this amount has been paid. To the extent the clients have not been fully reimbursed by the CFS, Montelongo shall use any settlement funds in excess of the $127,470 specified by the hearing panel, excluding reasonable attorney fees, to reimburse affected clients on a pro rata basis until all clients are fully compensated or the funds are exhausted. SCR 116(2) requires that an attorney seeking reinstatement must: demonstrat[e] by clear and convincing evidence that he or she has the moral qualifications, competency, and learning in law required for admission to practice law in this state, and that his or her resumption of the practice of law will not be detrimental to the integrity and standing of the bar, to the administration of justice, or to the public interest. Having reviewed the record, we conclude that clear and convincing evidence supports the panel's findings and conclusions. We therefore approve the panel's recommendation that the petition be granted 2 Montelongo provided documentation that appears to demonstrate that he has resolved the Ruiz grievance and paid the costs of the reinstatement proceedings. To the extent, if any, that these conditions are not fully resolved, Montelongo shall do so within a reasonable amount of time. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (D) I947A 40. subject to conditions. Accordingly, Manuel 0. Montelongo is hereby reinstated to the practice of law, subject to the conditions set forth above. It is so ORDERED. C.J. Gibbons lS4A, cie..47; , J. Hardesty ancari Parraguirre Douglas Cherry Saitta cc: David A. Clark, Bar Counsel Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada M. Nelson Segel Jeffrey Albregts, Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board Perry Thompson, U.S. Supreme Court Admissions Office SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 4 (0) 1947A e)