DocketNumber: 60840
Filed Date: 3/13/2013
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
First, Keeran argues that the district court erred by denying his claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to call Shelli Hannah on his behalf at trial. Keeran asserted that, unbeknownst to him, Hannah forged her estranged husband's signature on a check that he attempted to cash and thus he did not have the intent to commit burglary and forgery. See NRS 205.060; NRS 205.090; NRS 205.110. The district court conducted an evidentiary hearing and Hannah did not testify. The district court denied this claim because Keeran failed to demonstrate that Hannah's testimony would have changed the result at trial. We agree. Accordingly, we conclude that the district court did not err by denying this claim. Second, Keeran argues that the district court erred by denying his claims that counsel was ineffective for stipulating to the admission of the forged check and for agreeing with the State on key issues in his opening statement. The district court denied these claims because it determined that they fell under the purview of counsel's tactical decisions, see Rhyne v. State,118 Nev. 1
, 8,38 P.3d 163
, 167-68 (2002), and any objection would have been futile, see Ennis v. State,122 Nev. 694
, 706,137 P.3d 1095
, 1103 (2006). We agree. Accordingly, we conclude that the SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A ,dgi4g4' district court did not err by denying these claims. 1 Therefore, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. Gibbons Saitta cc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge Kristina M. Wildeveld Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk 1 Keeran also argues that the district court abused its discretion at sentencing because it relied on the "materially untrue" assumption that he was guilty of the crime. We decline to consider this claim because it is improperly raised for the first time on appeal. See Davis v. State,107 Nev. 600
, 606,817 P.2d 1169
, 1173 (1991), overruled on other grounds by Means v. State,120 Nev. 1001
,103 P.3d 25
(2004). SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A