Law Office Of Daniel S. Simon v. Dist. Ct. (Edgeworth Family Tr.)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
THE LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL S. No. 84367
SIMON,
Petitioner,
vs.
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FILED
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF NOV 1 6 21322
CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE
TIERRA DANIELI.:E JONES, 'DISTRICT
JUDGE,
Respondents,
and
EDGEWORTH FAMILY TRUST; AND
AMERICAN GRATING, LLC,
Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This original petition for a writ of prohibition or mandamus
challenges a district court order awarding petitioner Daniel Simon attorney
fees in quantum meruit. Simon argues the district court incorrectly
calculated the attorney fee award. But we already reviewed the challenged
district court order in a direct appeal, Edgeworth Family Tr. v. Simon, Nos.
83258/83260, 2022 WL 4298625 (Nev. Sept. 16, 2022) (Order Vacating
Judgment and Remanding),1 where we vacated the fee award and remanded
for further proceedings. As a result, Sinion has no order to challenge, and
his petition is thus moot. See Nat'l CollegiateAthletic Ass'n v. Univ. of Nev.,
Reno, 97 Nev. 56, 58, 624 P.2d 10, 11 (1981) CA moot case is one which seeks
to determine an abstract question which does not rest upon existing facts or
'We denied real parties in interest's petition for rehearing on October
31., 2022.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
If I ) I 947A
rights."). We decline to hear this moot petition. See Smith v. Eighth
Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (holding
that whether to consider a writ petition is discretionary). Accordingly, we
. ORDER the petition DENIED.
/
Hardesty
Stiglich
j.
Herndon
cc: Hon. Tierra Danielle Jones, :District Judge
Steve Morris
Rosa Solis-Rainey
Morris Law Group
James R. Christensen
Eighth District Court Clerk
2