Bourne Valley Court Trust v. Citibank, N.A.

 association may nonjudicially foreclose on that lien. The district court's
decision thus was based on an erroneous interpretation of the controlling
law and did not reach the other issues colorably asserted. Accordingly, we
REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND
REMAND for proceedings consistent with this order.
Pickering
Poen .
WI
(1a :ill__
0
Saitta
PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring:
For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v.
U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners
association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR
Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the
disposition of this appeal.
(besot
Parraguirre
cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge
Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Ltd.
Smith Larsen & Wixom
McCarthy & Holthus, LLP/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A