DocketNumber: 65022
Filed Date: 11/20/2014
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring: For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool I, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. ,334 P.3d 408
(2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal. Parraguirre cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Ltd. Brooks Hubley LLP Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A aeon