DocketNumber: 62152
Filed Date: 7/23/2013
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
NRS 34.810(3). Moreover, because the State specifically pleaded laches, appellant was required to overcome the rebuttable presumption of prejudice. NRS 34.800(2). First, appellant claimed the petition was timely filed because he filed it within one year of the issuance of the remittitur in his appeal from the denial of a motion for modification of sentence. Samora v. State, Docket No. 58748 (Order of Affirmance, March 7, 2012). NRS 34.726(1) provides that a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus must be filed within one year after the entry of the judgment of conviction or the issuance of the remittitur from the denial of a direct appeal from the judgment of conviction. Dickerson v. State,114 Nev. 1084
, 1087,967 P.2d 1132
, 1133-34 (1998). The prior appeal noted by appellant was not a direct appeal from the judgment of conviction. The timely filing date for a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus was one year after entry of appellant's judgment of conviction on June 8, 2007. Second, appellant claimed that he has a brain injury, which predated his crime, and has to rely on fellow inmates for assistance with preparation of legal documents. This failed to demonstrate good cause for filing an untimely post-conviction petition. 4 See Phelps v. Dir., Nev. Dep't of Prisons,104 Nev. 656
, 660,764 P.2d 1303
, 1306 (1988) (holding that petitioner's claim of organic brain damage, borderline mental retardation, and reliance on the assistance of an inmate law clerk unschooled in the law did not constitute good cause for the filing of a successive post- conviction petition). 4We note that appellant was determined to be competent prior to entry of his plea. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A Finally, appellant failed to overcome the presumption of prejudice to the State. Therefore, the district court did not err in dismissing the petition as procedurally barred and barred by laches. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. J. J. cc: Hon. Valorie J. Vega, District Judge Jay Lorin Samora Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk 3