Anderson (Jayon) v. State

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JAYON ANDERSON, No. 84182
Appellant,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
FILED
Respondent.
MAR 1 5 2022
ELIZAI3ETH A. BROM
CLERK OF UPREME COURT
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL ay
DEP Trs RK"
ytr Y
This is a pro se appeal frorn a district court order denying a
motion for credit for time served to correct illegal sentence. Eighth Judicial
District Court, Clark County; Crystal Eller, Judge.
Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an
order denying a motion for credit for time served, this court lacks
jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792
P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (explaining that court has jurisdiction only when
statute or court rule provides for appeal). Accordingly, this court
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.'
J.
Silver
, J.
Cadish Pickering
'A claim for additional presentence credit is a challenge to the validity
of the judgment of conviction and sentence and therefore must be raised in
a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See Griffin v. State,
122 Nev. 737, 744, 137 P.3d 1165, 1169 (2006). We express no opinion as to
whether appellant could meet the procedural requirements of NRS Chapter
SUPREME COURT 34.
OF
NEVADA
101 I947A Q(CFP.
- 08 D3
cc: Hon. Crystal Eller, District Judge
Jayon Anderson
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
. OF
NEVADA
( C)) 1447A 4i0r.
2