Kal-Mor-Usa v. Suntrust Mortgage

 REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND
REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings
consistent with this order.
J.
Hardesty
J.
CHERRY, J., concurring:
For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v.
U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners
association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR
Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the
disposition of this appeal.
J.
cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge
Maier Gutierrez Ayon, PLLC
Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 194,A e