Sfr Investments v. Nationstar Mortgage

 REVERSE the order granting summary judgment AND
REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings
consistent with this order.
, J.
J.
CHERRY, J., concurring:
For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v.
U.S. Bank, NA., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners
association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR
Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the
disposition of this appeal.
J.
cc: Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge
Howard Kim & Associates
Akerman LLP/Las Vegas
McCarthy & Holthus, LLP/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A e