Sfr Investments Pool 1 v. Deutsche Bank C/W 64415

 association's NRS 116.3116(2) superpriority lien has true priority over a
first security interest, and the association may nonjudicially foreclose on
that lien. The district court's decisions thus were based on an erroneous
interpretation of the controlling law and did not reach the other issues
colorably asserted. Accordingly, we
VACATE the order denying preliminary injunctive relief,
REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss, AND REMAND this
matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this
order.
Hardesty
Douglas
•e#7,4 J.
CHERRY, J., concurring:
For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v.
U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners
association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR
Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the
disposition of these appeals.
J.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(D) 1947A e
cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge
Howard Kim & Associates
Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1947A .0