Citation Numbers: 131 A. 141, 82 N.H. 157
Judges: MARBLE, J.
Filed Date: 11/3/1925
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
The sole question presented is whether or not an action can be maintained for negligent misrepresentation. This question was answered affirmatively in the case of Cunningham v. Company,
In this jurisdiction the principle is well established that negligent words as well as negligent deeds may constitute actionable fault Benoit v. Perkins,
The exception is overruled.
Judgment for the plaintiff.
SNOW, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Cunningham v. Company , 74 N.H. 435 ( 1908 )
Garland v. Railroad , 76 N.H. 556 ( 1913 )
Benoit v. Perkins , 79 N.H. 11 ( 1918 )
Maxwell Ice Co. v. Company , 80 N.H. 236 ( 1921 )
Compagnie Nationale Air France D/B/A Air France v. Cesar ... , 358 F.2d 203 ( 1966 )
Craig v. Everett M. Brooks Co. , 351 Mass. 497 ( 1967 )
Weisman v. Connors , 312 Md. 428 ( 1988 )
Geo. Byers Sons, Inc. v. East Europe Import Export, Inc. , 488 F. Supp. 574 ( 1980 )
Russell v. Hixon , 117 N.H. 35 ( 1977 )
Wilson v. Came , 116 N.H. 628 ( 1976 )
Brown v. Underwriters at Lloyd's , 53 Wash. 2d 142 ( 1958 )
Garapedian, Inc. v. Anderson , 92 N.H. 390 ( 1943 )
Serino v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. , 267 F. Supp. 396 ( 1967 )