Citation Numbers: 29 A. 638, 67 N.H. 216
Judges: Clark, Allen
Filed Date: 6/5/1892
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024
It is held, in Jenkins v. Fowler,
It is apparent that the testatrix used the phrases "what money I may have on hand" and "what money may be remaining at my decease" as embracing the same subject-matter, and there is nothing indicating that she used the word "money" in any sense different from the ordinary acceptation. The reasonable inference is that she meant, by "money on hand" and "money remaining at my decease," money in her actual possession and control and available for immediate use, — not money invested or deposited at interest in a savings-bank at a distance, and from which it could be drawn only at certain times and under certain conditions prescribed by the rules of the bank. The general provisions of the will, in connection with the situation of the testatrix and her property, indicate a purpose that the defendant should receive the bulk of her estate; and the defendant is entitled to the savings-bank deposit.
Appeal dismissed and decree of probate court affirmed.
ALLEN, J., did not sit: the others concurred. *Page 218