Citation Numbers: 64 A. 186, 73 N.H. 587
Judges: BINGHAM, J.
Filed Date: 6/5/1906
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
The amount of expenditure required to have remedied the defect from which the plaintiff received her injury had some tendency to show whether the defendants were guilty a want of care in not making repairs before the accident. Taylor v. Railway,
Exception overruled.
All concurred.
Smith v. Morrill , 71 N.H. 409 ( 1902 )
Rogers v. Kenrick , 63 N.H. 335 ( 1885 )
Mitchell v. Railroad , 68 N.H. 96 ( 1894 )
Reagan v. Railway , 72 N.H. 298 ( 1903 )
State v. Doran , 117 N.H. 491 ( 1977 )
Burke v. Railroad , 82 N.H. 350 ( 1926 )
Conn. River Power Co. v. Dickinson , 75 N.H. 353 ( 1909 )
Scully v. Railway , 76 N.H. 578 ( 1912 )
Spilene v. Company , 79 N.H. 326 ( 1920 )
Oulette v. Company , 79 N.H. 112 ( 1918 )
Hackett v. Railroad , 89 N.H. 514 ( 1938 )