Citation Numbers: 67 A. 577, 74 N.H. 310
Judges: YOUNG, J.
Filed Date: 6/29/1907
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
Statements made in the course of a transaction, or so soon thereafter as to form a legitimate part of it, are admissible in favor of the party making them in so far as they tend to explain it or the relation of the parties to it. Murray v. Railroad,
The evidence as to what the defendant's witness had said about testifying was relevant to the issue of his credibility. Consequently its admission was not error (Page v. Hazelton, ante, 252), *Page 311
even if it would not have been error to have excluded it (State v. Gates,
Exceptions overruled.
All concurred.
State v. Lapage , 57 N.H. 245 ( 1876 )
Murray v. Railroad , 72 N.H. 32 ( 1903 )
Dorr v. Railway , 76 N.H. 160 ( 1911 )
Wilson v. Railway , 78 N.H. 142 ( 1916 )
Conn. River Power Co. v. Dickinson , 75 N.H. 353 ( 1909 )
Scully v. Railway , 76 N.H. 578 ( 1912 )
Davis v. Railroad , 75 N.H. 467 ( 1910 )
Christie v. Company , 87 N.H. 236 ( 1935 )
Chellis Co. v. Railroad , 79 N.H. 231 ( 1919 )
St. Laurent v. Railway , 77 N.H. 460 ( 1915 )