Citation Numbers: 74 A. 180, 75 N.H. 319
Judges: WALKER, J.
Filed Date: 10/5/1909
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
The plaintiff admitted in his testimony that he knew at the time of his injury that if he allowed his foot to extend beyond the guard it would hit the floor above when the elevator went up through, but he testified that he was not thinking of the situation at that time. He was a boy of average intelligence and about fourteen years of age, who it appears understood the situation and appreciated the danger. It was unnecessary, therefore, for the defendant to instruct him that it would be dangerous for him to allow any part of his person to extend beyond the guard when the elevator was in motion. Hicks v. Paper Co.,
Exception sustained: judgment for the defendant.
All concurred.
Hicks v. Paper Co. , 74 N.H. 154 ( 1907 )
O'Hare v. Cocheco Mfg. Co. , 71 N.H. 104 ( 1901 )
Masters v. Public Service Co. , 92 N.H. 85 ( 1942 )
Tremblay v. Rudnick, C. Co. , 91 N.H. 24 ( 1940 )
Robinson v. Railroad , 85 N.H. 474 ( 1932 )
Lacasse v. Atwood , 80 N.H. 384 ( 1922 )
Hurlburt v. Company , 76 N.H. 469 ( 1912 )
Levesque v. Company , 84 N.H. 543 ( 1931 )
Myer v. LITTLE CHURCH ETC. , 37 Wash. 2d 897 ( 1951 )
Kirby Lumber Co. v. Hardy , 196 S.W. 211 ( 1917 )
Dallas Fair Park Amusement v. Barrentine , 187 S.W. 710 ( 1916 )
Cotelini v. Kearns , 79 Utah 470 ( 1932 )
Sevigny v. Company , 81 N.H. 311 ( 1924 )
Fontaine v. Company , 76 N.H. 163 ( 1911 )
Proulx v. Goodrich , 77 N.H. 297 ( 1914 )
McCaffrey v. Company , 80 N.H. 45 ( 1921 )
Sarkise v. Railroad , 88 N.H. 178 ( 1936 )
Paige v. Company , 80 N.H. 439 ( 1922 )
Bridges v. Company , 85 N.H. 220 ( 1931 )
Dziedzie v. Company , 81 N.H. 516 ( 1925 )