Judges： PER CURIAM.
Filed Date： 10/16/1939
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 10/19/2024
We consider that it was within the authority of the State Commissioner of Alcoholic Beverage Control to impose the *Page 318 regulation under review and to suspend the license of a violating licensee. Having in mind that this is the extent of the holding we affirm for the reasons stated by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, DONGES, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 11.
For reversal — PERSKIE, J. 1. *Page 319
Grand Union Co. v. Sills ( 1964 )
Affiliated Distillers Brands Corp. v. Sills ( 1970 )
Butler Oak Tavern v. Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control ( 1956 )
NJ Chamb. Commerce v. NJ Elec. Law Enforce. Comm. ( 1980 )
NJ ASS'N OF TICKET BR. v. Ticketron ( 1988 )
Lavin v. City of Camden ( 1961 )
Szabo v. NJ State Firemen's Ass'n ( 1988 )
Hutton Pk. Gardens v. West Orange Town Council ( 1975 )
Abbotts Dairies, Inc. v. Armstrong ( 1954 )
ASSOC. OF NJ ST COL. FAC. v. Bd. of Higher Ed. ( 1970 )
Como Farms, Inc. v. Foran ( 1950 )
Redeb Amusement, Inc. v. Tp. of Hillside ( 1983 )