Citation Numbers： 21 A.2d 737, 127 N.J.L. 245, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 254
Judges： PER CURIAM.
Filed Date： 9/19/1941
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 10/19/2024
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Perskie.
It is not contended that there is no sufficient basis in the evidence for the finding that the enucleation of the employee’s eye was due to the industrial accident; and we have not considered that question.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Fetter, Poetes, Colte, Deae, Wells, WolfsKetl, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Shuler v. EASTERN FOUNDRY, INC. , 34 N.J. Super. 216 ( 1955 )
Nelson v. Meeker Foundry Co. , 30 N.J. 139 ( 1959 )
Iacone v. Cardillo , 208 F.2d 696 ( 1953 )
Belth v. Anthony Ferrante & Son, Inc. , 47 N.J. 38 ( 1966 )
McKenzie v. Gulf Hills Hotel, Inc. , 221 Miss. 723 ( 1954 )