Citation Numbers: 184 A. 520, 120 N.J. Eq. 201
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 4/24/1936
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
The decree dismissing the bill of complaint is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the learned vice-chancellor.
The question of the jurisdiction of equity to grant the relief sought by complainants is reserved.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, JJ. 9.
*Page 202For reversal — LLOYD, PERSKIE, RAFFERTY, JJ. 3.
Williams v. Mack , 202 Minn. 402 ( 1938 )
Cole National Corp. v. State Board of Examiners of ... , 57 N.J. 227 ( 1970 )
Weston v. NJ State Bd. of Optometrists , 32 N.J. Super. 502 ( 1954 )
NJ Optometric Ass'n v. Hillman-Kohan Eyeglasses, Inc. , 144 N.J. Super. 411 ( 1976 )