Citation Numbers: 184 A. 520, 120 N.J. Eq. 201, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 688
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 4/24/1936
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024
The decree dismissing the bill of complaint is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the learned vice-chancellor.
The question of the jurisdiction of equity to grant the relief sought by complainants is reserved.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, WolfsKeil, JJ. 9.
For reversal — Lloyd, Pebsiue, Raffeety, JJ. 3.
Neill v. Gimbel Bros., Inc. , 330 Pa. 213 ( 1938 )
Williams v. Mack , 202 Minn. 402 ( 1938 )
Cole National Corp. v. State Board of Examiners of ... , 57 N.J. 227 ( 1970 )
Weston v. NJ State Bd. of Optometrists , 32 N.J. Super. 502 ( 1954 )
NJ Optometric Ass'n v. Hillman-Kohan Eyeglasses, Inc. , 144 N.J. Super. 411 ( 1976 )