Citation Numbers: 196 A. 679, 119 N.J.L. 337, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 268
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 1/26/1938
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in its opinion. We reserve, however, and do not pass upon, the question of whether the admission in evidence of a certain X-ray photograph was error.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Woles-Keil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
State v. McGrath , 17 N.J. 41 ( 1954 )
State v. Congro , 24 N.J. Super. 332 ( 1953 )
State v. Boening , 63 N.J. Super. 588 ( 1960 )
State v. Bunk , 4 N.J. 461 ( 1950 )
State v. Maxwell , 50 N.J. Super. 298 ( 1958 )
State v. Riley , 49 N.J. Super. 570 ( 1958 )
State v. Riley , 28 N.J. 188 ( 1958 )