Schantz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for ■ the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Parker, Bodihe, Heher, Perskie, Yah Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.