Citation Numbers: 124 A. 925, 100 N.J.L. 177
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 4/17/1924
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None. *Page 178
Public Service Commission v. Diamond State Telephone Co. , 468 A.2d 1285 ( 1983 )
State Ex Rel. Utilities Com'n v. Edmisten , 291 N.C. 451 ( 1977 )
In Re Proposed Increased Intrastate Industrial Sand Rates , 66 N.J. 12 ( 1974 )
City of Plainfield v. Public Service Electric and Gas ... , 82 N.J. 245 ( 1980 )
Elizabethtown Water Co. v. New Jersey Board of Public ... , 107 N.J. 440 ( 1987 )